|
View Full Version : Bush supports Hastert depite scandal GoodCitizenDan 10-06-2006, 12:35 AM http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061005/ap_on_go_co/bush_pages Anybody what to guess how long it'll take before Bush gives Hastert the medal of freedom? Stingray427 10-06-2006, 01:57 PM Go eat a acorn. All party lines aside the Dems couldn't get their lips close enough to Slick Willie during the Monica Scandal. Folie (Sp) did it. Hes out. Hastert was in his office doing some real work at the time. give it a rest. TheZenMan 10-06-2006, 02:02 PM Go eat a acorn. All party lines aside the Dems couldn't get their lips close enough to Slick Willie during the Monica Scandal. Folie (Sp) did it. Hes out. Hastert was in his office doing some real work at the time. give it a rest. It's Foley. And don't waste your breath. HaloGuardian 10-06-2006, 03:08 PM Yup don't waste your breath on foley. Just another distraction to real issues. TheZenMan 10-06-2006, 03:12 PM Right. The real issue is, Global Warming and greenhouse gasses cause gays. MsThang 10-06-2006, 05:57 PM I don't think that is a real "issue" specifically, but I do consider morals a bit of an issue for me. I do think there is a huge difference in emailing underage boys vs. getting head from a consenting OF AGE female. I also do think it speaks volumes about politicians in this country when they will cover something like that up to serve the purpose of thier own agendas-most of which aren't even remotely on track with what the American people actually want. So no, it isn't a partisan thing; it's a politician thing. I would be equally as disgusted if the democrats did it and will be even more disgusted if the democrats knew about it long ago, but waited to reveal it until this late in the game. Stingray427 10-06-2006, 06:17 PM Right. The real issue is, Global Warming and greenhouse gasses cause gays. So if I stop using arisol deoderant YLT will become straight? Stingray427 10-06-2006, 06:19 PM I don't think that is a real "issue" specifically, but I do consider morals a bit of an issue for me. I do think there is a huge difference in emailing underage boys vs. getting head from a consenting OF AGE female. Actualy they were both 18 when the issues began. Not that it makes either of them right. TheZenMan 10-06-2006, 06:37 PM Actualy they were both 18 when the issues began. Not that it makes either of them right. Nope, the gay kid was 16, but the age of legal consent just so happens to be 16 there. And I think maybe Monika was 19. The real question is, who gives a fuck? Stingray427 10-06-2006, 11:14 PM Nope, I heard it on Sean Hanity. Or maybe I dreamed it. Anyways, you're wrong. GoodCitizenDan 10-06-2006, 11:25 PM Nope, I heard it on Sean Hanity. Or maybe I dreamed it. Anyways, you're wrong. LOL. Dude, Sean Hanity is INFAMOUS for either misrepresenting or completely fabricating facts and figures. His grasp on the facts is like an elevator's grasp on music... Edit: And I'm aware that this is hardly newsworthy in any real sense. Still, have you read some of the IM transcripts. Holy shit are they funny! Stingray427 10-06-2006, 11:35 PM You DID notice the other option, didn't you... GoodCitizenDan 10-07-2006, 12:30 AM The good news is that this scandal might create just enough confusion and finger-ponting that the Democrats will be able to take over one or both houses.(yes, I realize its pathetic that a sex scandal is what's required to shake up the government) I'm no big fan of the democrats, but it has become apparent over the last few years that its a REALLY BAD IDEA to let one party hold the house, senate, and presidency at the same time. That seems to result in unchecked idiocy.... |